MCWP - Majumuda

Mast Climbing Work Platforms (MCWP)

The Ultimate Solution for Vertical Access in Construction
______

Mast Climbing Work Platforms (MCWP) are a modern, efficient, and safe vertical access solution for high-rise construction projects. Designed for both workers and materials, MCWPs offer superior stability, speed, and flexibility compared to traditional scaffolding and Self-Climbing Platforms (SCPs). With their robust, modular design, MCWPs significantly improve project efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance overall safety on construction sites.

MCWPs provide secure, enclosed platforms with guardrails, reducing fall hazards and improving worker protection. Unlike traditional scaffolding, which can be unstable if not properly assembled, MCWPs offer a fixed, reliable structure throughout the project.

MCWPs allow for larger work areas, enabling workers to access multiple levels simultaneously, significantly reducing downtime and improving productivity. Compared to SCPs, which are limited by the building's vertical progress, MCWPs offer continuous access at various stages of construction.

Unlike the fixed nature of SCPs, MCWPs can be easily repositioned, adapting to various building designs and heights. This flexibility allows them to meet diverse access requirements throughout the project.

While SCPs and scaffolding may have lower initial costs, MCWPs offer long-term savings by reducing labor, material handling, and setup time. The modular design also allows for reuse across multiple projects, making them a more economical choice in the long run.

MCWPs are more environmentally friendly than traditional scaffolding, as their components are reusable, reducing material waste and transportation costs

Industry Application

Key Benefits of MCWP
Over SCP and Scaffolding

Cost Efficiency

Equipment financing options available (unlike scaffolding).
Long lifespan (>30 years), reducing long-term costs.
Reduces labor costs and improves manpower control.

Increased Productivity

Speeds up work, reducing overall building time.
Boosts production efficiency by >30%.
Enables a factory-like working method at height.

Safety & Damage Reduction

Fewer accidents, lowering associated costs.
Minimizes damage to building materials and glass.
Requires fewer anchors, reducing repair work.

Workshop at Height

Equipped with onboard power supply for convenience.
Keeps façade clear and free from obstructions.

Comparison Of

MCWP vs SCP vs Traditional Scaffolding

MAST CLMBER WORK PLATFORM (MCWP)

– Less volume: transport, handling, cost
– High Flexibility (ascend & descend anytime)
– Asset to client (Equipment Not Accessories)
– Longer life-span
– Pick list and delivery note (least component loss)
– Pre-fab mounting by crane: Time & Cost
– Able to lift material and passenger
– No crane require for dismantling
– Higher efficiency
– Able to transport material up to 5 ton*
– Fixed cost

SELF CLIMBING PLATFORM (SCP)

– Least volume, and light weight
– Limited flexibility (unable to climb down)
– Need 2 stage of SCP to clean up finishing
– Additional cost (gondola for final finishings)
– Safety is equivalent to Traditional Scaffolding
– Approx. 5% to 10% of components lost per project
– Losses is higher if stored in open yard
– Built up by hand & crane assist (except climbing)
– High rigging costs
– Loose parts and accessories (susceptible to missing items)
– Require crane to install / dismantle

TRADITIONAL
SCAFFOLD

– High volume: transport, handling, cost
– Scaffold components scatter in site (lost materials at site)
– Risk of falling components
– Approx. 15-35% of components lost per project
– High Manual Installation (labour, cost, time) Cranage required

Category	MCWP	SCP	Traditional Scaffolding
Safety Features	Enhanced Worker Protection MCWPs offer superior safety features such as higher guardrails, enclosed platforms, and emergency descent systems. These features minimize the risk of falls and enhance worker security compared to both SCPs and scaffolding. Stability and Rigidity MCWPs are supported by vertical masts, ensuring excellent stability even in high-wind or high-rise conditions, offering better protection than scaffolding, which can be unstable or compromised in harsh weather.	Limited Flexibility While SCPs integrate with the building’s structure, they can pose risks if the building structure shifts or settles. Their rigid, fixed positioning means workers can be limited in accessing different areas of the building simultaneously, and safety protocols often depend heavily on the integrity of the structure itself.	Manual Setup Risks Scaffolding’s open structure, while flexible, is inherently less safe. Workers may be exposed to falling hazards when climbing or navigating between scaffold levels. Additionally, scaffolding is prone to instability if improperly assembled, posing greater safety risks. Risk of falling scaffold accessories like netting and pins.
Operational Efficiency & Productivity	Larger Work Area MCWPs offer spacious platforms capable of accommodating multiple workers, tools, and materials, significantly enhancing productivity. Workers can perform various tasks simultaneously on different levels of the building without the need to wait for access. Quick Setup & Mobility MCWPs are modular and can be assembled and moved with ease. Setup times are far shorter compared to SCPs and scaffolding. Continuous Access Unlike SCPs, which are limited to the vertical trajectory of the building’s growth, MCWPs can be moved and repositioned quickly to provide access to multiple staggered work zones.	Limited Flexibility While SCPs are self-climbing, they are typically restricted to the progression of the building’s vertical development, which means workers may experience delays as they wait for the platform to reach the desired height. This limitation reduces overall productivity on projects with complex or multi-level tasks. Fixed Capacity SCPs support fewer workers at a time, meaning larger crews may be required to complete work on different sections of the building at intermittent times, impacting overall efficiency and labour costs.	Labor-Intensive Setup The setup and takedown of traditional scaffolding are labour-intensive processes that can take several days. Workers must also frequently move between different scaffold levels, which may reduce overall task efficiency. Limited Space and Access Scaffolding can only support a small number of workers on each level, and workers often need to navigate between multiple scaffold sections, which further limits productivity.
Cost-Effectiveness	Long-Term Savings Though MCWPs may have a higher initial installation cost, their modular design and adaptability result in long-term cost savings. They can be used across multiple projects, reducing the need for repetitive scaffolding setups and allowing for greater reuse of equipment. Lower Labor Costs MCWPs reduce the number of workers required for manual assembly and adjustment. Additionally, the speed of operation and access to multiple work areas at once leads to faster task completion, further reducing labour costs.	High Initial Cost SCPs require substantial investment upfront, particularly for integration into the building’s structure. Maintenance and repairs can be costly due to wear on climbing mechanisms, and light weight materials. Limited Reusability SCPs are often designed for specific buildings and cannot be used efficiently across multiple projects, making them less cost-effective for varied applications.	Lower Setup Cost Traditional scaffolding is generally cheaper to install initially, especially for smaller projects. However, frequent disassembly, transport, and assembly costs add up over time, making scaffolding a less cost-effective solution in the long run. Higher Operational Costs Scaffolding requires ongoing maintenance and a larger workforce for setup, resulting in higher labour costs compared to MCWPs.
Environmental Impact	Sustainability MCWPs are more sustainable than both SCPs and scaffolding. Their modular design ensures that they can be reused on various projects, reducing material waste. Moreover, MCWPs are designed for long-term use and require fewer raw materials over time compared to traditional scaffolding, which is often discarded after each project.	Material Consumption SCPs require more raw materials for installation and integration, which can increase environmental costs. Their one-time-use nature on specific projects can result in higher material waste compared to MCWPs, which are reusable.	High Material Waste Traditional scaffolding uses large amounts of raw materials (steel, wood, etc.) for each project. The disassembly and transportation process also generate significant environmental impact, including waste and carbon emissions.

Types Of MCWP

SINGLE MAST CLIMBER

Mast climbers can be free-standing or tied to a structure at intervals for stability at increased heights. The mast may be supported on a stationary base, or for some projects that are lower, on a mobile base. Because mast climbers may be easily adjusted to optimize of working heights, they can reduce the potential for shoulder and lower back injuries to workers.

Proper platform positioning reduces material handling hazards and fatigue and improves productivity. Since guardrail systems are built-in, fall protection travels with the platforms. Their small base footprint makes mast climbers very useful on projects with limited space.

Mast climbers may be easily customized, and their flexibility gives many trades multiple options for performing work efficiently, in safe and ergonomically correct work conditions.

Mast Climbing Work Platforms (MCWP)

The Ultimate Solution for Vertical Access in Construction

MCWPs are more environmentally friendly than traditional scaffolding, as their components are reusable, reducing material waste and transportation costs

Key Benefits of MCWP Over SCP and Scaffolding